CWE Database
/

CWE-1021

Back to CWE list

CWE-1021

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

Base
Incomplete

Description

The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain.

Common Consequences

Scope

Access Control

Impact

Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data

Potential Mitigations

Implementation

The use of X-Frame-Options allows developers of web content to restrict the usage of their application within the form of overlays, frames, or iFrames. The developer can indicate from which domains can frame the content. The concept of X-Frame-Options is well documented, but implementation of this protection mechanism is in development to cover gaps. There is a need for allowing frames from multiple domains.

Implementation

A developer can use a "frame-breaker" script in each page that should not be framed. This is very helpful for legacy browsers that do not support X-Frame-Options security feature previously mentioned. It is also important to note that this tactic has been circumvented or bypassed. Improper usage of frames can persist in the web application through nested frames. The "frame-breaking" script does not intuitively account for multiple nested frames that can be presented to the user.

Implementation

This defense-in-depth technique can be used to prevent the improper usage of frames in web applications. It prioritizes the valid sources of data to be loaded into the application through the usage of declarative policies. Based on which implementation of Content Security Policy is in use, the developer should use the "frame-ancestors" directive or the "frame-src" directive to mitigate this weakness. Both directives allow for the placement of restrictions when it comes to allowing embedded content.

Implementation

In addition to frames or iframes as previously mentioned, the web application is expected to place restrictions on whether it is allowed to be rendered within objects, embed, or applet elements.

CVE-2017-7440

E-mail preview feature in a desktop application allows clickjacking attacks via a crafted e-mail message

CVE-2017-5697

Hardware/firmware product has insufficient clickjacking protection in its web user interface

CVE-2017-4015

Clickjacking in data-loss prevention product via HTTP response header.

CVE-2016-2496

Tapjacking in permission dialog for mobile OS allows access of private storage using a partially-overlapping window.

CVE-2015-1241

Tapjacking in web browser related to page navigation and touch/gesture events.

CVE-2017-0492

System UI in mobile OS allows a malicious application to create a UI overlay of the entire screen to gain privileges.

Applicable Platforms

Not Language-Specific

Security Training

Train your team to recognize and prevent security threats with our comprehensive security awareness program.

Start Training

Vulnerability Scanning

Discover vulnerabilities in your applications and infrastructure before attackers do.

Scan Now