CWE-1021
Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames
Description
The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain.
Common Consequences
Scope
Impact
Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data
Potential Mitigations
The use of X-Frame-Options allows developers of web content to restrict the usage of their application within the form of overlays, frames, or iFrames. The developer can indicate from which domains can frame the content. The concept of X-Frame-Options is well documented, but implementation of this protection mechanism is in development to cover gaps. There is a need for allowing frames from multiple domains.
A developer can use a "frame-breaker" script in each page that should not be framed. This is very helpful for legacy browsers that do not support X-Frame-Options security feature previously mentioned. It is also important to note that this tactic has been circumvented or bypassed. Improper usage of frames can persist in the web application through nested frames. The "frame-breaking" script does not intuitively account for multiple nested frames that can be presented to the user.
This defense-in-depth technique can be used to prevent the improper usage of frames in web applications. It prioritizes the valid sources of data to be loaded into the application through the usage of declarative policies. Based on which implementation of Content Security Policy is in use, the developer should use the "frame-ancestors" directive or the "frame-src" directive to mitigate this weakness. Both directives allow for the placement of restrictions when it comes to allowing embedded content.
In addition to frames or iframes as previously mentioned, the web application is expected to place restrictions on whether it is allowed to be rendered within objects, embed, or applet elements.
CVE-2017-7440E-mail preview feature in a desktop application allows clickjacking attacks via a crafted e-mail message
CVE-2017-5697Hardware/firmware product has insufficient clickjacking protection in its web user interface
CVE-2017-4015Clickjacking in data-loss prevention product via HTTP response header.
CVE-2016-2496Tapjacking in permission dialog for mobile OS allows access of private storage using a partially-overlapping window.
CVE-2015-1241Tapjacking in web browser related to page navigation and touch/gesture events.
CVE-2017-0492System UI in mobile OS allows a malicious application to create a UI overlay of the entire screen to gain privileges.
Applicable Platforms
Security Training
Train your team to recognize and prevent security threats with our comprehensive security awareness program.
Start TrainingVulnerability Scanning
Discover vulnerabilities in your applications and infrastructure before attackers do.
Scan Now