CWE Database
/

CWE-352

Back to CWE list

CWE-352

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Compound
Stable

Description

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

Common Consequences

Scope

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Non-Repudiation
Access Control

Impact

Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

Potential Mitigations

Architecture and Design

Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]

Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Architecture and Design

Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]

Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CVE-2004-1703

Add user accounts via a URL in an img tag

CVE-2004-1995

Add user accounts via a URL in an img tag

CVE-2004-1967

Arbitrary code execution by specifying the code in a crafted img tag or URL

CVE-2004-1842

Gain administrative privileges via a URL in an img tag

CVE-2005-1947

Delete a victim's information via a URL or an img tag

CVE-2005-2059

Change another user's settings via a URL or an img tag

CVE-2005-1674

Perform actions as administrator via a URL or an img tag

CVE-2009-3520

modify password for the administrator

CVE-2009-3022

CMS allows modification of configuration via CSRF attack against the administrator

CVE-2009-3759

web interface allows password changes or stopping a virtual machine via CSRF

Applicable Platforms

Not Language-Specific

Security Training

Train your team to recognize and prevent security threats with our comprehensive security awareness program.

Start Training

Vulnerability Scanning

Discover vulnerabilities in your applications and infrastructure before attackers do.

Scan Now